15th October 2004 - Primary Principals Concerned at Second Level Principals' Position on Teaching

Primary Principals concerned at Second Level Principals' position on Testing

Primary Principals are very concerned at the views expressed today by the President of NAPD, representing Second Level Principals, on standardised testing of children in Primary Schools.

For over two years a joint sub-committee of IPPN and NAPD has been working on standardising procedures for the transfer of student data from primary to post-primary schools in a professional and holistic manner which reflects the whole curriculum and not merely literacy and numeracy. Such a complex and student-sensitive issue as transition from first to second-level school deserves greater consideration from school leaders than narrow-focused testing. Primary Principals are deeply committed to the successful implementation of the revised Primary curriculum. Narrow-focused testing threatens the very raison d'etre of such a forward thinking curriculum.

Ends

Further information from:

Virginia O'Mahony, President IPPN
Seán Cottrell, Director IPPN

Read more ...

Last Updated: Friday, 15 October 2004 01:00

29th September 2004 - IPPN Key Events 2004/05

Event: IPPN / NAHT North South Principals' Seminar
Venue: Slieve Russell Hotel, Cavan
Date: November 23rd & 24th 2004
Theme:Special Education & Small Schools - Exploring Cross Border Experiences
Speakers: Dr Mark Morgan, St Patrick's College, Drumcondra
Dr Sheila McGrogan, Regional Training Unit, Belfast

Event: IPPN Conference 2005
Venue: CityWest Hotel
Date: February 3rd , 4th & 5th 2005
Theme:Inspiring Leadership
Speakers:Ms Geraldine Kennedy, Editor, Irish Times,Ms Áine Lawlor, Director, Teaching Council

Event:ICP Cork 2005 (International Confederation of Principals)
Venue:Maryborough Hotel, Douglas, Cork
Date:March 7th - 12th 2005
Theme:The Challenge of Recruiting and retaining School Leaders
Speakers:Professor Kathleen Lynch, UCD andMr Michael Farrell, UCC

Read more ...

Last Updated: Wednesday, 29 September 2004 01:00

30th June 2004 - Principals concerned about Sponsership Motivation

Principals concerned about sponsorship motivation

92% of principal teachers disapprove of Coca Cola and McDonalds promoting their products through primary schools. This was the key finding when the Irish Primary Principals' Network sought the views of school principals on the subject of childhood obesity.

"I feel that supporting educational initiatives sponsored by McDonald's, Coca Cola etc. is merely opening the henhouse door and inviting the fox to pay for security"

These findings result from an on-line survey involving 510 principals which was conducted by IPPN in June 2004 - see details attached.

When asked 'Would you support educational initiatives which are sponsored by companies such as Coca Cola or McDonald's?', 6 out of 10 principals said 'No'. However, the most revealing aspect of this question was the depth of feeling expressed by principals why they are frequently forced to support such initiatives out of sheer necessity.

"The only reason I'd take sponsorship from Coca Cola etc. is that we are so under-financed and we are actually desperate to fund even the most basic educational items."

While 99% of the 510 principals surveyed believed that the school has an important role in educating children about healthy lifestyles, there was a strong feeling that schools alone cannot solve the problem of childhood obesity.

"It is parents in particular who need educating in this regard. Yes, the school plays an important role by educating pupils re nutrition, healthy diet, importance of exercise, lifestyle etc., but the effect will be limited unless this important issue is addressed on a wider scale; primary schools can only do so much. I think it is time to hand back responsibility for these issues to parents. Every time a social issue is raised in the press, schools are the first target to remedy the situation. I am a parent as well as an educator and this is a central issue for parents. I would advocate the DES funding health education programmes for all parents. Parents are the essential link in the chain if we are to address this problem".

Over five hundred principals from all parts of the country took part in the survey. While 99% agreed that schools do have a role in educating children about healthy diet and lifestyle, only 8% would support initiatives that involve product promotion sponsored by commercial interests.

ENDS

Survey data and direct quotes from principals below.

Further information:
Sean Cottrell, Director, IPPN.
O21 452 4925 (Office) 086 6478717 (Mobile)


Obesity Survey Data

Total Respondents: 510 % Yes % No
School's Role re healthy lifestyle? 99 1
Support educational initiatives sponsored by ... 41 59
Approve of product promotion? 8 92

Direct Quotes from Principals

"Last week we got a call from our local GAA club asking if we would accept a consignment of Coca Cola for our pupils! We had a visit from the president of the GAA accompanied by other high-ranking officials and a county player. We were presented with a certificate commemorating this visit on which the Coca Cola logo is prominently displayed. The whole event was over before I realised how we had been conned! Deirdre, Dublin West
I feel that schools are not the place to allow advertising. School should be a safe place for children. The DES should finance schools sufficiently that schools do not have to accept help from companies in return for advertising space. This year has been the worst so far for the amount of advertising that has come to our school.
Ask Cumann na mBunscoil why they got 'into bed' with McDonalds for their Catch n' Kick programme." Enda Nolan

"I have no problem with these multi nationals or indeed with our own Irish companies, newspapers groups etc., who wish to 'support' children's wellbeing and who wish to improve school resources. I say let them give us this financial help anonymously with no strings or advertising involved. Then we would truly know their real commitment to our children. I somehow suspect that these 'concerned' organisations would quickly lose interest in such noble endeavours. It is simply scandalous the way schools are seen as just more markets for their advertising. All Schools should employ a complete ban on any involvement whatsoever in such cynical promotions." Deasun Hennessy

"In an under-funded educational system it can be very difficult to resist some initiatives which may be offered at no cost to the school, even when these initiatives are sponsored by "unhealthy food" companies e.g. who else, apart from McDonalds, has ever given schools free footballs, team bibs etc. in the recent past, bearing in mind the meagre DES grant towards PE? Sometimes it's a case of "needs must"! A moral dilemma!
Successful marketing and targeting of children by food and drinks companies has had a profound effect on the level of obesity now evident in school children throughout Ireland. An investment in resources and training in PE Programmes by the DES would be welcomed by this teacher. Also a ban on advertising aimed at children on TV." Margaret

"Children's text books (especially Irish) are full of references to fast foods -- burger, chips. Crisps, pizza, cola. This just shows how much fast foods have become a way of life. All we can do is emphasise the fact that these are for occasional eating or treats, not everyday and regular eating. This is where the food pyramid comes in and is so important." Frank, Tipperary.

"I really feel that if schools were adequately resourced in the area of sports equipment they would not dream of accepting sponsorship from companies who cleverly target children through attractive offers of sponsorship. We really have been placed in a position of "all offers gratefully received" A. Kingston

"Too many promotions coming into schools - one, in fact (The Independent newspapers one) endorsed by the Minister of Education and Science. It puts children/parents under undue pressure which is simply abusing the power of schools." J. O'Niell

"There should be a Healthy Lunch Box Policy in all schools. Department of Ed & Science to appoint Physical Education Instructors to visit schools throughout the country giving guidance to teachers and encouraging children in all areas of sport. This would happen if the DES was even remotely serious about children's health and fitness.
Maybe Noel Dempsey would provide us with a hall or gym in school......!!
Childhood Obesity is also linked in my opinion to lack of exercise as well as diet. Schools could have a greater impact in this if they had proper PE facilities and lower pupil-teacher ratio as they have in many European schools. However the minister now told schools to use their PE Rooms as classrooms. Many schools have no PE Rooms or are already using them as classrooms. So before the minister has any more bright ideas on schools solving childhood obesity he should get back to basics and give us proper schools." John, Donegal

"Very often educational initiatives funded by McDonalds, Coca Cola etc are lucrative and provide sports equipment and classroom resources which otherwise cannot be bought by school due to lack of funds." Frustrated!

"Hard call when it comes to getting much needed sports equipment etc from the likes of McDonalds or refusing same because of problems their products are causing. Without doubt the parents need to be educated and to take more responsibility for their children's eating habits. I feel teachers CAN and Do play an important role but SHOULD'NT have to." Valerie Bhreathnach.

"What's the point in being against such promotions (even though I suppose that we really should) when Cumann na mBunscoil is actively supporting them - McDonalds - with gaelic football and hurling skills programmes!" James.

"We do have a role to play as do parents and more to the point Roinn Oideachais or Sláinte. We need proper facilities for P.E. not bits of a school yard with no proper surface. I could go on but the Depts. seem to think that producing a glossy brochure and circulating it to schools will do and think we can change the world. I also feel that there is too much emphasis on winning in schools as regards sporting activities. Only 25 players get on panels. What happens to the rest? Leave the competitions to the clubs and they should also play their part by not having any competition until kids are 14. We all have responsibilities but schools should not be the ones carrying the heavy load.
Companies want to make profit - Multi-nationals see gaps in the market and fill them. DES under-funds schools - therefore the time is always ripe for companies to promote their products through schools. Catch 22?"

"McDonalds and Coca Cola are world leaders in the area of targeting children in their promotions. McDonalds involvement in Gaelic Football and the Coca Cola involvement in the Compromise Rules Internationals are two of the most recent attempts to promote their brand names among the children. The Coca Cola bus and tour of the factory in Dublin is another attempt to inculcate the brand loyalty image in the children. As educators we have a very important function to make children aware of the huge negative influence exerted by the multinational food companies on our diet and general health and well being. As well as covering the whole topic of nutrition and healthy eating we should be making the children aware of the whole question of sustainable agriculture in the context of the overall future of the planet. We should be exploring the myth of cheap food with our pupils." Micheál Ó Braonáin

"It takes great effort to promote a healthy eating policy in a school from the point of view of -time demands made on a lot of working parents today( across the socio economic spectrum) and the convenience of commercial snack food products and drinks -lack of education re nutrition and healthy eating among disadvantaged families. School guidelines/policy need to be supported by broader community focused initiatives from the Health Boards. In Primary schools for many of the younger children, the responsibility lies with parents/guardians for lunch provision." Mary Hankard

"While we have received and accepted footballs/hurleys sponsored by McDonalds many of the staff are uneasy with the support the GAA are indirectly giving by organising these competitions (i.e. Catch and Kick....)
As resources for schools are very scarce, I must admit to accepting the McDonald's GAA pack but I then removed all the self-adhesive logos & calling the programme "St. Ronan's GAA Skills Programme". Áinnle Ó Néill

"It is very difficult not to support the ventures of these companies as they have linked up with the GAA to promote activities such as the 'Lift and Strike' programme presently running in Primary schools. If the DES would fund these very worthwhile activities we would all feel a lot easier. Most schools have a Healthy Eating Policy active in their schools, yet we feel constantly undermined by the advertising machine behind these companies. We are persistently trying to undo the work of these highly powered multinationals and if we don't take part in their sponsorship programmes our children feel left out and hard done by."

Read more ...

Last Updated: Wednesday, 30 June 2004 01:00

18th June 2004 - Principals not convinced by new 'weighting system' for SEN resources

Principals are not convinced by new 'weighting system' for SEN resources

Today's details of the new 'weighted' approach to allocating resources for children with special education needs (SEN) in primary schools, have not raised the hopes of principals. The Irish Primary Principals' Network (IPPN) acknowledges that the new model has potential to reduce unnecessary bureaucracy and the unacceptable length of time that it takes the DES to respond to individual requests for children with SEN. However, the new system unveiled by the DES today leaves many key questions unanswered.

Recognising that there is a higher incidence of SEN amongst boys, the DES have now improved the quota of pupils required for each extra Support Teacher from 150 : 1 to 140 : 1 in a boys school. Sadly, in doing so the situation for girls has been dramatically worsened whereby extra SEN teachers will be appointed on a 200: 1 ratio. Before gender differences in SEN were addressed, a common ratio of 150: 1 had been tabled. Principals of all-girls' schools are now asking why their pupils are penalised with a dramatic drop in their resourcing levels.

IPPN welcomes the improved resourcing pupil ratio of 80 : 1 for designated disadvantaged schools, however, this masks a far deeper problem - the designation of schools with disadvantaged status is completely anomalous and lacking in fairness and transparency. There are numerous examples of schools sharing the same catchment areas and even on the same campus, one with and the other without designated disadvantage status! Using this simplistic approach to allocating additional SEN resources to children with social and economic disadvantage may indeed be convenient, but it merely magnifies the existing anomalies.

The heart of the problem lies in the fact that this is not a weighted system at all. It is merely an effort to spread out available resources as evenly as possible using a quota system. A true weighted system was first flagged more than ten years ago by the Special Education Review Committee (SERC) but was never implemented. What is needed now is a genuine weighted system based on a points rating attached to each child with special education needs, supported by a proper national pupil database - still not in existence in this country in 2004.

'Dropping' major system changes just as schools are about to close raises many serious questions about the timing of this announcement. It is unfair that the burden of this system change will be left to fall upon principals yet again with serious additional workload to be undertaken during official holidays. The DES' approach to change management flies in the face of good planning. Principals are also seriously concerned that parents of children who up to now have enjoyed one-to-one SEN resourcing will have to be informed that this ratio will be disimproved by the new quota system. This may give rise to legal challenges.

The hard reality for principals, parents and children with SEN is that there are still 6,000 children whose applications for resources have not been responded to. While acknowledging that the new 'weighted' (quota) system will allow schools to redeploy staff for many of these children, in several cases, up to two years later there is still no indication from the SEN Unit in the DES as to what level of resources will be made available. We take great pride in Ireland that we have a 'child centred' education system, however the resourcing of SEN appears to contradict this philosophy.

Ends

For further information:
Seán Cottrell, National Director, IPPN.
O21 452 4925 (Office)
086 6478717 (Mobile)

Read more ...

Last Updated: Friday, 18 June 2004 01:00

IPPN Sponsors

 

allianz_sm